Dan WHO??
Last night O'Reilly made a comment regarding Rather's knowledge or lack of knowledge about the forged documents -something to the effect that Dan was proved right, he DID NOT have anything to do with the setup.
I won't waste my time listening to him again. He can't seem to decide what he is and I'm not interested in hanging around until he does.
Just think about all of those HUGE news stories of the past, the ones that really got attention, Iran-Contra, Watergate, Abu-Graib, every single story, then you know it is a MSM thing. Dan is in the middle of all of them.
It is rather ironic that the Elder Bush made that statement to Rather, and now Rather's career IS being judged on one incident, ie. the forged TANG papers.
Oh sure, you can rattle off a hundred other Rathergate fiascos, but it's the forged papers that brought him down.
A fitting end for a perfect fool.
they will have to leave the windows open in Rather's former office for weeks to get rid of the stench
O'Reilly still doesn't realize that many of us stopped our loyal viewing of the factor because of his wish-washy stance on memo-gate. And I'm still waiting for the results of his internal investigation he promised us.