Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Petronski

"Why would it? Because if I have $100,000, I can buy a $100,000 untaxed existing home, or I can buy a taxed new home and need an extra $23,000 in tax (or alternatively, I can buy a lot less house and pay the tax and house out of the $100,000)."

Apples to oranges. Under the FairTax, corporate income and payroll taxes will have been eliminated, along with their enormous compliance costs. Therefore, a house that would have cost $100K in price will be significantly less under the FairTax. When you add the sales tax onto the reduced price, you are back to about the $100K level. The biggest difference is that the tax burden will be explicitly broken out, rather than buried in the purchase price as before.


195 posted on 03/08/2005 11:48:34 AM PST by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: phil_will1

Apples to oranges? No. This is not a before v. after scenario. I'm talking about a day after you have succeeded in killing the income tax and instituting the 'fair tax.' At that point, I am making a choice between an existing home or new construction.

Taxing the new construction but not the existing home provides a significant disincentive to new construction. I'm guessing you don't work in the trades, or in logging, or manufacturing of construction goods....


205 posted on 03/08/2005 11:51:45 AM PST by Petronski (This is the Serengeti, heart of the Dark Continent, where Bar Codes roam free...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson