Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wolfie
Those are all valid choices. But for the earner on the low-end of the income scale, its less likely to be a choice than a matter of what they can afford. That's where they get hit with reduced buying power under the NRST. Get back to a flat tax on income, and I'm happily on board.

The low-end will always have less buying power no matter what the plan is. In fact, under a flat tax, you will not be giving a rebate based on the poverty level, whereas under the Fair Tax bill, you will. Those that hover around the poverty level will pay virtually no taxes.

Please read:

Is it fair for rich people to get the exact same FairTax rebate from the federal government as the poorest person in America

Here is the whole Fair Tax FAQ:

Fair Tax FAQ
165 posted on 03/08/2005 11:36:01 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty ("Science without religion is lame; religion without science is blind." —Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: Kerretarded; Wolfie; CSM; camle; All

Discussion with John Linder who introduced HR 25:

http://boortz.com/more/022505_power_lunch_audio.html


172 posted on 03/08/2005 11:39:04 AM PST by groanup (http://www.fairtax.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson