Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Constitution Day
Hawass had long refused to allow DNA testing on Tut's remains

Thanks for reading for me~!

Anyway, I wonder why? I understand not wanting to do something invasive, but with an opportunity like this, it seems a shame not to.

15 posted on 03/08/2005 6:11:19 AM PST by Lijahsbubbe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Lijahsbubbe

You're welcome. :)

I don't really know why, but I agree with you.
From the article, it seems the only reason not to is Because Zahi Hawass Said So.


17 posted on 03/08/2005 6:14:33 AM PST by Constitution Day ("Marsa Stert is a britch and and I sit on the exhange")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lijahsbubbe

Because they might find out he was JEWISH! (His real name was Tutstein).


18 posted on 03/08/2005 6:14:48 AM PST by Pharmboy ("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lijahsbubbe; Constitution Day
Since the use of the past perfect "Hawass had long refused" doesn't really answer the question, I looked around, found this:

Detailed still photos, DNA smears or other hands-on inspections weren't done, complains Saleh Bedeir, who resigned from the Supreme Council's scientific team when it was decided to bring out Tut. "This was just show business. It has nothing to do with science," Bedeir says.

That's from http://www.freenewmexican.com/news/10877.html

23 posted on 03/08/2005 6:40:55 AM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson