And what's wrong with opening it up to another audience, especially when he was getting feedback from "truckloads" of letters, cards, ect...saying that some didn't take their family members to see it because of the violence?
He didn't do it in the first place, because he wanted to depict it as it was. Not sanitize it, as many others in the past did.
The movie's for everyone. He wanted everyone to see it. So if there was another way for him to introduce it to those who didn't see it the first time, why not cater to what was asked of him?
I fail to see your point on "it's all about the money." The judgement on that is between he and God. Not we who sit back in the rafters and can only speculate, usually without all of the facts.
And if it were, so what? He'll put it back into his company, charity, or whatever he choses. He's making a living. That's a problem?
Good answer. I'm more than grateful to have seen the film in its original, undedited version. That being said, I was unable to bring myself to see it a second time due to the graphic imagery. I also know at least one person who wouldn't go see the film because of its well-deserved "R" rating for violence.
It'll be a treat to see The Passion again in its new form, and I'll be pleased to purchase the DVD of the re-released version whenever it becomes available. Thank you, Mr. Gibson, for making your film available to those of us who are hyper-sensitive to graphic imagery.