Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreedomCalls
Check out some of the discussion here.

You are much less safe flying over blue water with only three engines, because you can't climb to proper cruising altitude and so burn more fuel. Which is exactly what happened - the plane barely made it to Manchester.

Another aspect of the story that seems left out is that the decision to fly on saved British Airways over $200k in compensation they would have been required to pay. What a coincidence - the compensation regs come into force on 1 March and suddenly BA allows its planes to fly minus one engine.

Fly Boeing. But don't fly BA.

56 posted on 03/07/2005 5:56:13 PM PST by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: John Locke
You are much less safe flying over blue water with only three engines, because you can't climb to proper cruising altitude and so burn more fuel. Which is exactly what happened - the plane barely made it to Manchester.

So what's the difference between buring more fuel due to an IFSD and burning more fuel due to excessive headwind? Planes divert to their alternate due to bad weather at their primary every day. It's not a big deal.

62 posted on 03/07/2005 6:04:25 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson