Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GBA
Thanks for your thoughtful post and the kind words.

Pilots must make judgment calls all the time, and during emergencies that is when they really earn the big bucks they are paid. In this case, I suggest the pilot abdicated his responsibility by allowing some ground-based "manager" in London decide what is a safe course of action. The pilot was flying the jet. The pilot experienced the event. The pilot knew something was wrong, very wrong, and the pilot knows best what is a safe and sound course of action.

Given that the pilot did not know if there was additional damage I submit the prudent course of action would have been to dump gas and land as soon as practicable, not necessarily as soon as possible. A difference. Many emergencies do not require an immediate landing, whereas some do and damned the gross weight.

Dumping gas on a 747 is something I am not familiar with. However, if he remained in the local area and if something else happened (likely/possible) he would have been basically on final approach and able to land ASAP if need be. If he continued on he would be (at times) over an hour away from a suitable landing field. Not good.

FAA regs recommend courses of action but at no time are the regs justification to violate the principles of sound judgment. So, FAA regs may offer guidance they may not be all-encompassing directive regarding the safe operation of your aircraft. The pilot is the ultimate authority to ensure safe operation of the aircraft.

That said, if you do have an emergency and violate regulations, the FAA will investigate and assess if your actions were prudent. Caution in how you operate an aircraft is the watchword here. No one blames a pilot for being safe. Everyone blames a pilot when he exercises poor judgment and opewrates an aircraft in an unsafe manner, and rightfully so.

I hope my comments help. I fault the pilot for not acting as a pilot.
178 posted on 03/09/2005 12:02:55 PM PST by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: Gunrunner2
Fair enough. Thanks for taking the time to explain your take on the story. Clearly, the vast majority of those who posted on this story agree with you and will approve of the FAA's actions post event. It will be interesting to follow this case.

The main thing is that, other than landing at their alternate, things turned out ok for the passengers. Clearly, there is something wrong with that a/c as it suffered another engine failure not long after this one.

Thanks again. I hope to one day find out just how many beers/drinks/etc. it take to get you to tell some of your F-15 and A-10 stories.

179 posted on 03/09/2005 6:12:52 PM PST by GBA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson