Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carl in alaska
I think this plane should have dumped fuel in the Atlantic and landed somewhere on the east coast for repairs.

Considering it took off from LAX it started out over the Pacific. In order to dump fuel over the Atlantice, it would have to cross the US first.

The Miami incident was an emergency landing. I not sure if they got down to the recommended maximum landing weight or not. They didn't have much choice, because the engines weren't going to last very long.

Considering the flight path was going to be over land for the first few hours anyway, why dump fuel when it could be burned off enroute to an alternate destination where the passengers could be switched to another plane? The other three engines seemed to be working fine. It would seem to me that flying over the continental US with three engines working would not be very risky considering the number of airports available for diversion if necessary.

108 posted on 03/07/2005 7:48:40 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Paleo Conservative
I was assuming the engine gave out in mid-flight and that continuing on to the Atlantic was the best course of action. But after reading the whole article, apparently the engine failed early in the flight, so they should have returned to LA and dumped fuel in the Pacific. When your passengers' lives are at stake, the crew must use an abundance of caution and land the plane as soon as possible. Then they have to make all repairs needed to make sure the key components of the airplane are functioning at full capability. This was reckless behavior by the Brits and I'd be really angry if I had been on that flight.

Yes the Miami incident with Eastern Airlines was a dire emergency and it may have been a really hard, over-weight landing (but of course better than crashing from total engine failure).

128 posted on 03/07/2005 8:59:17 PM PST by carl in alaska (The mission for today is golf. The mission code word is "Julius Boros".....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: Paleo Conservative
Most seem to be missing the point of this.

Due to some changes in rules in Britain, the Airline is now responsible to pay compensation to passengers at forced layovers.

This is all about the bottom line and not the first time it has happened since the new rules were announced apparently.

The FAA wants them to change these rules or mandate compliance to U.S safety standards.

I don't blame them a bit.

133 posted on 03/07/2005 9:19:09 PM PST by Cold Heat (This space is being paid not to do anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson