Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romanowski trial: Doctor says Williams has 'irreversible' injuries
Contra Costa Times ^ | 3/7/5 | Ivan Delventhal

Posted on 03/07/2005 3:16:50 PM PST by SmithL

OAKLAND - Former Oakland Raider Marcus Williams has suffered "irreversible" brain damage as a result of being punched in the face in August 2003 by then-teammate Bill Romanowski, a doctor testified today.

Dr. William Mathews, who has 37 years' experience as a brain surgeon, testified in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland as a witness for Williams in the ex-player's multimillion-dollar civil lawsuit against Romanowski.

Williams, 27, alleges his promising National Football League career when Romanowski knocked his helmet off and delivered a practice-field uppercut on Aug. 24, 2003. James Brosnahan, Williams' lead attorney, said the punch broke Williams' eye socket and caused brain trauma, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Mathews, who is affiliated with several Bay Area hospitals including John Muir Medical Center in Walnut Creek and Mount Diablo Medical Center in Concord, testified today about his observations of the effects of the blow.

"Overall, I think that Marcus Williams has a traumatic injury to his brain that in some aspects is irreversible," Mathews testified.

The surgeon said the injury has manifested itself in changes in Williams' personality and has also affected his intellect, speech, memory, vision and balance. Some of those changes, the doctor testified, are "probably irreversible."

Several of Williams' family members, including his mother and grandmother, testified last week in the civil trial that the punch had broken his spirit, transforming him from an upbeat and gregarious young man to someone who is now irritable and withdrawn.

Romanowski's attorney have rejected that notion that the punch resulted in any serious injuries and have characterized Williams as a marginal player now looking for an illegitimate payday.

Mathews is expected to continue testifying this afternoon.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nfl; raiders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last
To: blowfish
and ending his career

Williams was cleared to play by NFL doctors (including those on the Raiders staff) - Just because he went out and BOUGHT one doctor to suggest he can't play doesn't make it so -

What it does make it is like someone who is looking to make a quick buck -

81 posted on 03/07/2005 6:14:23 PM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
That would be the DA's mistake though, not a mistake by someone in this forum. That it is not prosecuted does not change the nature of the act. I might argue that D.B Cooper didn't steal anything either since he isn't charged. Bill Clinton committed perjury yet he was not charged. And Johnny Cochran can make the semantic argument that Clinton's lying it not perjury until he is convicted. Its kind of the walks like a duck thing at this point.

But hey, I was wrong about the whole Red Sox thing. And my wife will assure you that I've been wrong about plenty of other stuff before.

82 posted on 03/07/2005 6:22:59 PM PST by bpjam (I don't know what a neo-con is and neither does anybody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: bpjam
In this particular case, the plaintiff is going to lose hundreds of thousands at least and possibly millions of dollars simply by being unable to make an NFL roster during the few peak years he has

Small problem here - From what I remember reading Williams was CLEARED to play by NFL doctors and also cleared by the Raiders staff Doc -

So he went out and bought a Doc for this lawsuit saying he can't play -

83 posted on 03/07/2005 6:25:48 PM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: bpjam
But hey, I was wrong about the whole Red Sox thing. And my wife will assure you that I've been wrong about plenty of other stuff before.

LOL. All I'm saying is no one on this forum really knows what happened on that field 'cept someone got their bell rung. Hardly enough info to have an informed opinion.

84 posted on 03/07/2005 6:33:54 PM PST by skeeter ("A nation without borders is not a nation" RW R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Not the Kansas City Chiefs.

Don't get me started...

85 posted on 03/07/2005 6:36:10 PM PST by skeeter ("A nation without borders is not a nation" RW R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; Petronski
I am not going to warn you two again.

This thread is no place for extraneous remarks based on common sense. Leave logic out of this and re-address this topic in a manner befitting a true sports fan, or switch over to politics immediately.

86 posted on 03/07/2005 6:41:56 PM PST by Kenny Bunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
Then Romo has nothing to worry about. I'm sure that the Raiders team doctors will be a witness and they can testify to the extensive care they take of players and percentage of damage to a players vision which is required to actually catch a pass from an NFL quarterback. And if the team doctor is more persuasive than the plaintiffs doctor, Romo gets off scott free. I was even treated by one of the former Raiders team doctors and I'm glad I had the ability to get a second opinion when a ruptured disk was misdiagnosed as a 'soft tissue injury.'

You may have played college football but I've been involved in hundreds of lawsuits. And I could put on a very good defense of Romo if this was just a case of gold-digging. Of course, Romo's teammates are going to be witnesses as well and they might be able to testify about what constitutes being 'cleared' to play by team doctors.

Personally, I would hope that this guy is really damaged long term and they can both get over this so they can get back to blowing all their money on Hummers and hookers and continue to help the economy recover. But I don't get to choose the facts. I just get to choose what I think about them. And I don't think I've heard anything yet about Romo that I find defensible.

87 posted on 03/07/2005 6:43:10 PM PST by bpjam (I don't know what a neo-con is and neither does anybody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Skooz

Stern advice (from one who knows): do NOT become 'invested' in the Chiefs (emotionally or otherwise). They will break your heart, wallet, and quite possibly your self-esteem.


88 posted on 03/07/2005 6:43:32 PM PST by flushed with pride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

[grumble grumble]

Okay.




KILL THE BASTARDS!


89 posted on 03/07/2005 6:47:57 PM PST by Petronski (Zebras: Free Range Bar Codes of the Serengeti)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Let's close this out with DevSix's private response to me:

Brilliant response - And for the record I did serve 82nd Airborne - 502 Bat - (after going to 4 years of college).

There is no 502 Battalion. in the 82nd. There is, however, a 502 PIR (Parachute Infantry Regiment) in the 101st. Perhaps, you just mixed up your movies, MF'er.

90 posted on 03/07/2005 7:02:06 PM PST by surfatsixty (Proud Father of a USMC Grunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: surfatsixty

LOL. How . . . euh . . . 'tough.'


91 posted on 03/07/2005 7:06:25 PM PST by Petronski (Zebras: Free Range Bar Codes of the Serengeti)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
He flew into a steroid rage and gave his own teammate a cheap shot.I'm a Raider fan who feels Romanowski should pay dearly for what he did.He's lucky the team was able to talk the guy out of pressing criminal charges.It's just my luck that we got rid of an idiot like Romo and picked up Moss who is a bigger idiot.I'd settle for a player with less talent and a big heart over a guy with more talent and a bad attitude any day.
92 posted on 03/07/2005 7:09:13 PM PST by rdcorso (We Are A Nation Fighting Against The Deadly Disease Of Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
The reason it was pointed out about "playing football or not" - was merely to show that fights on the practice field happen all the time...

Surely then you can point out some other examples of roid ragers sneaking up behind other players, ripping their helmets off and punching their eye sockets into their brains.

Happens all the time, right? How 'bout you google me up a few?

93 posted on 03/07/2005 7:09:23 PM PST by Petronski (Zebras: Free Range Bar Codes of the Serengeti)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
That's about as valid as comparing paper clips and supersonic jets.

Clip shiny. Jet shiny.

94 posted on 03/07/2005 7:10:49 PM PST by Petronski (Zebras: Free Range Bar Codes of the Serengeti)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
How 'bout you google me up a few?

No time, he's busy inventing the next internet...

95 posted on 03/07/2005 7:10:59 PM PST by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Fine then, whatever you say.

Here I am abandoning all logic and common sense.

The 49ers will do just fine this year, even with the Yorks at the helm.


96 posted on 03/07/2005 7:26:02 PM PST by SmithL (Proud Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Don't you get it? The plaintiff is a "thug" (nod, wink) and is just trying to pull a fast one.


97 posted on 03/07/2005 7:27:22 PM PST by stands2reason (Mark Steyn on GWB: "This is a president who wants to leave his mark on more than a cocktail dress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

My lack of tolerance for the n00bs is expanding exponentially...


98 posted on 03/07/2005 7:31:40 PM PST by stands2reason (Mark Steyn on GWB: "This is a president who wants to leave his mark on more than a cocktail dress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

You keep referring to this as a fight. This wasn't a fight. If "romo" wasn't such a "homo", he would have squared off with Wiliams. Instead he pulled his helmet off and sucker punched him. Yeah, fights happen on the practice field but you always keep it in your head that the guy your pissed at is your teammate. What Homo did crossed the line. He didn't want to fight, he wanted to attack a teammate and do as much damage as possible to him and he did it from behind like a back jumping little f@ggot.


99 posted on 03/07/2005 7:38:43 PM PST by Skip Ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

How intolerant of you to show a lack of tolerance.


100 posted on 03/07/2005 7:40:30 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson