[Phsstpok]

What the dems are doing is a planned strategy against a large block over the entire first Bush term against numerous Republican appointees. What happened twice during the eight years of the Clinton tumor on the body politic were spontaneous reactions to freakazoid extremists.

And personal attacks of the type you put up as "debate" makes me question your motives.

Your "ignorance and BS" be on your head, sir.

[neverdem]

And personal attacks of the type you put up as "debate" makes me question your motives.

Your "ignorance and BS" be on your head, sir.

It wasn't a personal attack, wasn't intended as an insult nor was it directed to you. I have read the word "unprecedented" in numerous articles. Freeper ambrose prompted me to verify that pubbies used this tactic before. It doesn't make pubbies look good, squealing like stuck pigs, over a parliamentary tactic they used against the bent one at least twice, if not more.

I believe we should hope the dems keep this up. In 2006, Bush should campaign against dem incumbent senators in "red" states making the point that the incumbent senators wouldn't grant a vote for these judicial nominees who believe in the constitution as it was originally intended, and not in making law from the bench as almost all dem nominees wind up doing.