I would chip in, too. It's not about whether Terri's life is cost-effective. It's about whether the STATE can determine who lives and who dies. And when. And why.
I would like to see the husband pay back all that money he took from Terri's account that was granted to her by a jury for her care and rehabilition. The money has not been used for any rehabilitation. It has been used to fight for Terri's death. The husband lied to the jury when he said he would take care of her until he died and that Terri was his life.