Isn't arnett the douche who kept Saddam's crimes under wraps so that CNN could stay in Baghdad?
If so, why does anyone care what a propagandist liar like this has to say?
Finally, even if this were true, can the libs honestly say that Saddam's son would be an "improvement"? LOL
No, that was Eason Jordan.
Most could care less what he said I'd hope. He's using dead people for sources, how's he supposed to back it up?
Just like that quote he won a Pulitzer for, it's all simply bulls**t. He needs attention.