Posted on 03/02/2005 1:03:35 AM PST by MindBender26
The 2008 Five Five Democrats have begun informal staff interviews for 2008 presidential runs, according to a few who've been interviewed. So far, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is dubbed "the most aggressive" in seeking out aides, followed by Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack . The others are Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh, former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards , and 2004 candidate Sen. John Kerry .
I hope you are right and you may be.
One concern I have is that I want to get the Iraqi army up and functional before the election. I fear a voter backlash, if we are still bearing the main defence burden in 11/2008.
Well, I see old Crusty Britches is up to her neck, as usual.
That's a really interesting idea. My only concern would be Hillary and her goons attempting to thwart distribution somehow. I don't put anything past them.
When she was "running" for Senator of New York (I say "running" because her election was all but bought up and sold before it even started), I was standing not 50 feet from her while she marched in a parade two blocks away from me in Queens New York. If you think the faces she made in that poster is bad, you should see her in person. Like I was telling another freeper, she would point to a group of people, make a face, and the group of people would look behind themselves thinking she was pointing to someone else. I followed her for about 10 blocks and she did that over and over and over and over with each new group that was stupid enough to call her name. "Phony" doesn`t even come close when finding a word to describe this woman. "Psychotic" is more like it. Not once did she walk over to any of these people and shake their hands, it was all just going through he motions.
"Hillary! Hillary! We love you!"
"You the man! you the man!"
That`s exactly what she is doing in those pictures. That`s her "technique" when campaining, pointing to people and making a bizarre face.
Both the bitch and Kerry have to get re-elected in 2006. Hopefully they'll both be sent into retirement then.
Exactly what I was thinking. It would have to be sent in plain wrapping with no return address like it was pornography. LOL ;-)
LOL! I like your thinking! How about return addresses to Democratic Party headquarters?
LOL!!! Fabulous!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.