[elephantlips]

You can only fault the process if the findings are tainted. The first question should always be; "Is it true?"

[Gilbo_3]

PING

To 'bang' and 'banglist' keywords.

“most historians, however, reject the individual rights interpretation.” This fringe interpretation was to be the basis of much work to come for Cornell

How long do we have to dispute the fact that most liberal Constitutional 'scholars' even agree that the 2nd is an INDIVIDUAL right ???

[SteveH]

The main purpose of the institute appears to be to manufacture research as input for upcoming SCOTUS 2A decisions.

http://www.glenninstitute.org/glenn/index.asp

[Don W]

All this "blah blah blah" about the 2nd amendment.

If the namby-pambys think that it was for a military outfit, WHAT did same outfit use BEFORE the amendment was passed?

Were armies forbidden arms ? Did George Washington defeat the British Army (who were charged with enforcing GUN CONTROL LEGISLATION and were doing so) with mere rhetoric and wordsmithing?

The Second amendment is CLEARLY, and without doubt intended that those who desire and want to possess and bear arms are BOUND to, by THEIR OWN WILL!