Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaBroasta
Sorry, but you're wrong on that score too. When you were alive in the womb (pre-Roe v Wade) the law prevented your mom from terminating you.

The law is not the ultimate prevention - it only makes the consequences of a chosen act more severe. Does the speed limit prevent you from going as fast as you think you can get away with? If it does, you are in a small minority.

The speed laws are there to regulate traffic towards safety. The laws that would try to regulate what choice a woman makes about a process taking place within her body are motivated by a particular segment of religious belief - not appropriate for a free society.

91 posted on 03/07/2005 10:37:51 AM PST by Semper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Semper
The speed laws are there to regulate traffic towards safety. The laws that would try to regulate what choice a woman makes about a process taking place within her body are motivated by a particular segment of religious belief -not appropriate for a free society.

I'll find myself sort of agreeing with you here--there's a fundamental and profound difference between man's law and God's law. And while I may occasionally break man's law against speeding, I'll never break God's law by taking an innocent life.

94 posted on 03/08/2005 3:12:21 PM PST by DaBroasta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Semper

You wrote: "The laws that would try to regulate what choice a woman makes about a process taking place within her body are motivated by a particular segment of religious belief - not appropriate for a free society." Would you mind telling me just when 'the processes' occurring in the woman's body can be legitimately (and that doesn't necessarily mean ONLY legally) considered another human being to be protected from being killed?


98 posted on 03/08/2005 3:34:53 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: Semper

Ahem, I want to issue to you a public apology for losing my temper toward you. I find it extremely difficult to be tolerant of willful ignorance when the issues are life and death ones. I will now presume you are not willfully ignorant (so your ignorance can be cured, if you give a small degree of purposeful research into the issues of individual human life) and apologize to you for losing my temper toward you.


100 posted on 03/08/2005 3:47:46 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson