Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1LongTimeLurker
My guess is that their decision was based on an interpertation of the 8th amendment, which reads

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

This I know, but since when is executing a 17yo murderer "cruel and unusual"?

The answer is "When 5 Supreme Court justices flaut the will of the voting public with fabricated new rights never before seen in the Constitution."

812 posted on 03/02/2005 3:45:28 PM PST by Smedley (I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt. I mean not that fancy store bought dirt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies ]


To: Smedley
This I know, but since when is executing a 17yo murderer "cruel and unusual"?

What can be more cruel than killing someone? How is it not unusual when so many states ban the execution of minors?

820 posted on 03/02/2005 5:27:46 PM PST by 1LongTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson