To: Halls
"
Yeah, this is big, but honestly I think I have to agree with their decision."After all, if someone is killed by a person under the age of 18, he isn't quite as dead as if he were killed by an adult.
Makes sense to me. (/sarc.)
To: nightdriver
After all, if someone is killed by a person under the age of 18, he isn't quite as dead as if he were killed by an adult...if someone is killed by a person "who is drunk and driving, therefore not fully understanding his actions", he isn't quite as dead as if he were killed by a sober person.
459 posted on
03/01/2005 9:14:46 AM PST by
colorcountry
(All the people like us are we, and everyone else is They. ...Rudyard Kipling)
To: nightdriver; Next_Time_NJ
After all, if someone is killed by a person under the age of 18, he isn't quite as dead as if he were killed by an adult. Makes sense to me. (/sarc.)
HA! Sounds like a liberal's arguement.
464 posted on
03/01/2005 9:18:35 AM PST by
Netizen
(jmo)
To: nightdriver
You must really hate "manslaughter" laws, then. After all, isn't someone killed accidentally just as dead as someone who's murdered?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson