Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

Im shocked myself. I never thought i would agree with the Lib side of the court, but this is a very touchy subject for me. I am not sure if they ever actually killed someone under 18 before, but i am on the side of the justices today...

Anyway, it doesnt matter.. agree with it or not.. its the law now.. and nothing will change that unless Bush appoints new justices to overturn it.

Might as well open your window and scream.. thats all you can do at this point.


140 posted on 03/01/2005 7:47:09 AM PST by Next_Time_NJ (NJ demorat exterminator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Next_Time_NJ

I've changed my mind so many times regarding the death penalty that I will not condemn either side for its opinions (I'm currently in a pro-death penalty phase, for whatever that's worth.)

What bugs me about this decision, however, is that AGAIN, certain members of SCOTUS have taken it upon themselves to create this "right", supposedly found in the Constitution, when nothing of the sort is mentioned there. It seems that when babies' lives are at stake, this chimerical document finds "rights" of mothers where none exist to kill the innocent unborn, and now, for hardened killers who happen to be under the age of 18, they will not face the ultimate consequences for their acts. It is a sad, sad day for the legal system to have this view prevail.


335 posted on 03/01/2005 8:30:31 AM PST by alwaysconservative (At this death of Common Sense, I wonder how well the funeral will be attended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson