Man and Woman”, “Wife”, “Husband”, “Widow”, “Widower” Banished From all Ontario Law

LifeSiteNews ^ | February 25, 2005 | LifeSiteNews

[gidget7]

""What a nightmare! Will all kids just take mom's name instead?""




Guess they must forget about geneology also, there will be no way to trace roots. No way to know if one is predisposed genetically to any sort of illness, no medical background.

[Old Professer]

Romeo and Romiet?

[Old Professer]

Conehead.

[Hardastarboard]

It's time to invade Canada again, defeat them this time, and convert them to Christianity.

[gakrak]

Ping!

[ladtx]

[gakrak]

Way to go Canada, we love to see you bending over for the homo high hard one. LOL

[Howlin]

LOL.

[gakrak]

One can only hope. Their life style is a sin and we can hate that, and only hope they repent.

[gakrak]

Me thinks HIV and Aids was the start of the cleansing process. No cure in sight. Amen.

[Robert Drobot]

Does the United States recognize Canadian licensed marriages? If so, is our Congress nullifying that standing?

[gakrak]

Likewise my family lives 40 miles across the lake to Toronto, and we refuse to cross the border or buy any of their products.
Their toast.

[shellshocked]

He who controls the words controls the argument. This is nothing but communist style propaganda.

Funny how liberals hate bannings and censorship yet practice it to the extreme.

[LowOiL]

BTTT...

[Major_Risktaker]

Canada is becoming communistic and the homosexual agenda leads to communism.

Canadians are subjects to the British Crown and I guess Noble, Princely, Royal, and Imperial Titles get a past so far to the gender neutral laws.

King, Queen

Prince, Princess

Grand Duke, Grand Duchess

Duke. Duchess

Marquess, Marchioness

Earl, Countess

Baron, Baronet

Baron, Baroness

Viscount, Viscountess

Sir,Lady

Can't sell these in Canada

[fortunecookie]

Guess they must forget about geneology also, there will be no way to trace roots. No way to know if one is predisposed genetically to any sort of illness, no medical background.

The ID chip will be the next 'logical' solution to this self-created mess. It could track both medical and financial info. Some will complain, but the logic will be there. It won't really work in the end, just create an even larger mess, a giant nanny state like out of bad science fiction. And for now? Well, with their superior healthcare (not!), a quick, affordable dna scan will quickly rule out any illness or other issues. Barf. They are racing toward one giant quagmire. And since any 'person' can 'marry' whatever other 'person', why let the old-fashioned notion of close relative interfer, with the possible ensuing genetic issues? In this Canada rushing out of control, people will be urged to have just one or 2 kids for sake of the environment, with free abortions for those that are not perfect or are unplanned or unwanted. And any issues that should have been preventable? One downward spiral. I keep waiting for cooler heads to prevail on this, but...

[Delbert]

Idiots Eh?

[DBeers]

mangina's???

ROTFLMAO -I will have to employ that term into my homosexual opposition lexicon...

[Larry Lucido]

“Man and Woman”

Well, we could just say "human unit," but that would unfairly discriminate against non-human organisms.

[Siamese Princess]

Shades of Aldous Huxley's Brave New World. Ladies And Gentlemen: Its not enough to ban gender. We must ban the subversive idea of love as well lest humanity rediscover heterosexuality - man and woman and husband and wife and all the bad things we have forbidden you to partake of. So others' feelings will be spared.

I've thought the same thing -- that the Western World, at least, is heading towards Brave New World. In the book, marriage and family have disappeared, love is a dirty word, promiscuity is enouraged and expected, the population is doped up on soma and watches the virtual reality feelies, and the citizenry is taken care of. Aldous Huxley imagined promiscuity, but of the heterosexual variety -- I suppose even he didn't think that society would sink so low as to celebrate homosexuality. On the other hand, perhaps his publishers wouldn't permit it -- the book was originally published in the early 1930s. Society as a whole still had standards of decency.