Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tutstar

I scanned, and I do mean scanned, it. What do you think about the parts that mention court hearings and court orders involved in a protective custody process? This seems to envision the DCF and a court working in tandem to carry this out. Do you read it that way? What court? If it is Greer or one of his close buds, this protective custody procedure is doomed. Why go round and round only to end up in the same place? Greer is demon-inspired to pull her tube out and commence starvation on the 18th. That is abuse right there. But then he gets to rule on the efficacy of an abuse investigation? Surely not.


4,623 posted on 03/10/2005 5:26:23 PM PST by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4614 | View Replies ]


To: txrangerette

that is a very astute point. This is so insidious!


4,626 posted on 03/10/2005 5:32:28 PM PST by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4623 | View Replies ]

To: txrangerette

I'm about to get off for the night, don't feel good.

Yes it talks about working with the court...I think the part we need to pay attention to is the emergency protective action.
You can't just refuse to cooperate with DCF.

Maybe someone else can help before tomorrow.

Night all....


4,637 posted on 03/10/2005 5:57:23 PM PST by tutstar ( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.freerepublic.com/~tutstar/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4623 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson