it is when they made a feeding tube an artificial means of keeping someone alive...before then, a feeding tube was not considered extra means of keeping someone alive
You should see these Bills.....their parts have parts. And it certainly isn't light reading. You can't read this and not keep thinking of Terri.
Actually I just thought of this, someone had mentioned it before. All they have to do is quit feeding Terri, I don't see anything in the statute saying that it is necessary to remove the tube. I wonder if Felos is up to something, iow setting a new precedent with Terri's case to end the insertion of feeding tubes. I know this thought is way out there, but why is it necessary to remove the tube? It isn't.