Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS

It would have been incredibly risky -- probably suicidal -- to be anything BUT isolationist in the Washington era.


53 posted on 02/26/2005 1:24:51 PM PST by stands2reason (Mark Steyn on GWB: "This is a president who wants to leave his mark on more than a cocktail dress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: stands2reason

Exactly. Washington had no trouble with "expansionism" (i.e., trying to start a war with France at Ft. Necessity) but he was extremely pragmatic, and knew we didn't have the economy or the military to do much in 1796.


61 posted on 02/26/2005 1:51:45 PM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news (there is no c in Amtrak and no truth in MSM news))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson