[olde north church]

Basically, he wasn't about to watch the gravy train leave the station. I would find that somewhat acceptable evidence, it's common enough of a situation. The "not consistent with just a fall", wouldn't carry as much weight, anything interpretational, like that, is being condescending. It's sort of like, "We're from the government, trust us.", it's too vague. Especially a year after the fact. Would you want to be judged or have your children judged on that type of "evidence". If something looked like it was done by say, a baseball bat, say a baseball bat, not "inconsistent with a fall".
My understanding of the situation was something transpired that caused her to have a heart attack, which went untreated, which led to the coma. Thanks for your info.

[reaganaut]

"not consistent with a fall" is not my wording, but the Doctor's. Secondly, the bone scan showed cracked ribs, both knees, and several other broken bones (it's online at terrisfight.org) were determined to be too numerous to get from just a household fall (again their interpretation). I also know there is some question medically to the evidence of the heart attack. And, since he's a nurse, he could gain access to drugs that simulate a heart attack (there was a famous murder case based on this). I'm a death historian and have done extensive research on murders made to look like accidents. I'm pretty well convinced.

I'm not the type to jump on a conspiracy bandwagon, but the evidence is online and it's pretty damning against Michael Schiavo.