Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Deb

The excuse the Palace is putting out for the Queen not attending is fairly insubstantial - they're suggesting her attendance would automatically make a "simple ceremony", not simple at all.

Not really. Security, et al - all those complex arrangements were taking place anyway. This indicates her displeasure with either the wedding itself, or how it's been done, which admittedly, has been full of cock ups.

Regards, Ivan


134 posted on 02/22/2005 2:14:59 PM PST by MadIvan (One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: MadIvan

I'll wait to see what the explanation from the palace is. The worst possible motives are always attributed to the Royals. Very annoying.


139 posted on 02/22/2005 2:18:33 PM PST by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

To: MadIvan
According to this both sets of children will show up.

Queen to Stay Away From Royal Wedding

LONDON (AP) - Buckingham Palace said Tuesday Queen Elizabeth II would not attend the civil marriage ceremony of her son Prince Charles and Camilla Parker Bowles.

The Queen, would however, attend the church blessing following the civil ceremony, the Palace said.

Britain's Press Association reported that Prince Charles' sons Prince William and Prince Harry and Parker Bowles's children, Tom and Laura, were expected to be present for the April 8 civil wedding in the Guildhall at Windsor.

AP-NY-02-22-05 1601EST

140 posted on 02/22/2005 2:18:40 PM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson