Would you mind explaining something to me?
You link to an article, which I read, and after all the information given personally by the doctor, you are qouting a third party source of information which conflicts with the Doctor's very own words in print in the article you linked to.
Is that right?
I'm sorry...having a hard time understanding your question...
You said you wanted a link to show she had flat EEGs.
The page I linked to is extremely pro-Terri. I find it to be full of misinformation, but because it's biased toward Terri, and it shows him attempting to explain *why* her EEG showed no activity, I thought you would believe him, at least.
I though of all people, you'd believe Hammesfher, who sure wouldn't underestimate Terri's results...
If you insist, I will go back & cite you specific pages out of PDF files. But I really think it would be very helpful to you to read the Wolfson report to Bush. He was the appointed guardian ad litem for Terri by Bush's order.
http://www.miami.edu/ethics2/schiavo/wolfson%27s%20report.pdf