Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
One further tning, however, is I do think it should at least be given SERIOUS consideration in scientific circles for a couple reasons.

1st, IF it should happen to be true, it could aid in intuitive leaps in understanding across disciplines if a common relationship, a clearer understanding of God's purpose, can be discerned. If it is false, such consideration will cost nothing.

2nd, It may serve to help reinforce faith by giving a clearer understanding of his purposes, rather than making us become more dogmatic and destroying faith when we run headlong into a wall.

Seems to me to be a win/win all around.

301 posted on 02/22/2005 3:04:49 PM PST by WindOracle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]


To: WindOracle
If it is false, such consideration will cost nothing.

The assumption of regular process is the only assumption that science can work from. It's the definition of science. Make no difference what you believe the ultimate cause is.

311 posted on 02/22/2005 3:49:37 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]

To: WindOracle
It may serve to help reinforce faith by giving a clearer understanding of his purposes, rather than making us become more dogmatic and destroying faith when we run headlong into a wall.

I would advise not basing one's faith in worldly knowledge. I think the Bible says this somewhere, but I could be misreading it.

319 posted on 02/22/2005 4:11:51 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson