[AntiGuv]

It would be better to say that particles-to-people evolution is an unsubstantiated hypothesis or conjecture.

Well, I guess it would be better to say that if it weren't an outright lie transparently exploiting people's ignorance. At least calling it a theory would be accurate - notwithstanding the insidious calculation that not few will misinterpret the term.

[crail]

Agreed, but sometimes you can't get everything you want when searching creationist sites for arguments that refute creationists. You can get some good stuff though!

"We cannot discover by scientific investigations anything about the creative processes used by the Creator." Duane Gish, Evolution? The Fossils Say No!

If so, then how is creationism science again Duane?