Actually, I just wanted to reestablish our posting. It's always refreshing to see you on a thread. Whether I agree or disagree, you pose an interesting challenge.
And if you want to call me a DUer, that's OK. We both know it's not true. You and I simply use those 'cattle prods' to gain reaction to something we to which we want an answer.
The point of my 'anti-religious bigot' remark was to tweak you for cloning this lying sack of anthropology to 'creationists'. There are enough black marks on both sides of the crevo ledger that no one should feel that comfortable when throwing stones at the other.
My sentence construction in that last post was appalling. I'm eating a Qdoba burrito. It affects me.
> The point of my 'anti-religious bigot' remark was to tweak you for cloning this lying sack of anthropology to 'creationists'.
For that to work logically, one would have to assume that the whole world of religion is Creationism-based, and to be opposed to Creationism is to be bigotted against all religions.
Tain't true.