Standard creationist blatting. And exactly how many of those "frauds" were corrected by "creationists" as opposed to OTHER SCIENTISTS?? Answer: Creationists = 0%, Scientists = 100%.
Yahsee, TRUTH is what SCIENCE does, despite the fact that some few scientists either make mistakes or commit outright fraud. But that is what you creationist nutcases fail to understand---it isn't just evolution you have to debut---you ultimately have to discard the entire structure of multiple fields of science in order to get things warped sufficiently to support "biblical creationism".
"We can both play the accusation game, or we can discuss the merits of the article."
What merits?? You mean the few adulterated snippets you posted?? I think not.
"You've accused these authors of taking information out of context. Now either prove it or admit that you were lying when you made the accusation against them"
No, dude, I have accused the CREATIONISTS who cut and pasted portions of the article onto a nutcase website of having taken the information out of context. Since the only REAL information available is an abstract, who can tell how out of context the information is. Certainly that abstract doesn't support the conclusions in your "article". But "I have faith" that the information "is" taken out of context, because that is the consistent practice of creationists. I "do" note in passing that even the snippets of the article posted don't support the biblical creationist viewpoint ("push back the origin of very introndense genome structures over a billion years to the plant-animal split"). Kind of hard to have a billion years of history when the earth is only 6000 years old.
So basically you had no foundation to accuse them on.