MD4BUSH...Who Are You? [O'Malley - Democrat sleaze]

WBAL ^ | February 15, 2005 | Chip Franklin

[82Marine89]

I noticed that also. He also uses emails as responses.

[Dog]

I think there is more to it than that....

[hole_n_one]

I thought that name looked familiar.

[okie01]

The MD4Bush posting you're referring to, the TIPP poll, was posted twelve minutes before the Steffen story was posted on the Washington Post website.

That was for the purpose of the embedded link in the story itself. MD4Bush was obviously working in close concert with the WaPo reporters (or was one of the WaPo reporters).

[NonValueAdded]

Private chat room? Holy AOL, Batman, did the author do any research or just make assumptions based on their own limited experience?

[Dog]

When was MD4Bush's first post.

When did the NG story blow up in Rathers face?

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Well the only other facilities they have access to are the rest stop bathrooms.

Would you use a public restroom?

[Jim Robinson]

I believe the "MD" in "MD4Bush" stands for Maryland. Also believe the "4Bush" part is 180 (or 360 as one prominent Democrat once stated) degrees out of whack. I also have no doubt that one or more reporters were in on the set up. Sorry to be so reluctant to name names... waiting on the legalities.

[Dog]

Thank you Jim.

[hole_n_one]

See #23

[bubbleb]

Sir, I've been courious since you posted this: I don't expect anymore details from you, I just trust you to handle it.;) Posted by Jim Robinson to advance_copy
On News/Activism 02/11/2005 9:49:44 AM PST · 20 of 122

I've got some very interesting information for the governor's investigation regarding the Maryland Democrat Party dirty trickster that setup Steffen and the Washington Post reporter er, Democrat operative that was working in concert with him. Almost hoping to receive a subpoena.

[AmishDude]

Wow. Bizarre to do this. Especially after the story broke. It sounds too spiteful for reporters. Somebody working in Duncan's office perhaps?

[AmishDude]

Interesting. It suggests MD4BUSH was attempting to provide some "grounds" for the WaPo story. Why it was "all over the Internet" doncha know?

[Lazamataz]

Well the only other facilities [bears] have access to are the rest stop bathrooms.

Too many gays there.

And you ain't SEEN pissed-off until you've seen a buggered bear.

[Lazamataz]

Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.

LOL!

[deadhead]

Matthew Mosk
David Snyder
4Bush

[eddie willers]

Private chat room? Holy AOL, Batman, did the author do any research or just make assumptions based on their own limited experience?

I don't think the general public would understand "freepmail".

[Snidely Whiplash]

Also while Steffen was posting, someone appeared on the site, MD4BUSH, who pushed and prodded to Steffen to tell more. Steffen and MD4Bush spoke in a private room (pt2) and exchanged thoughts about O’Malley and again MD4Bush pushed and prodded Steffen.

Hm. So...what it sounds like to me is this MD4BUSH character egged Steffen on. Is that basically what you're saying?

Because having read the original threads, Steffen sure didn't seem to me like he needed much poking and prodding to run his mouth. "The devil made me do it" worked for Geraldine, but not for an educated man who surely knew better.

SW

[NonValueAdded]

No, the general public might not understand the term FReepmail without explanation, but they certainly would be familiar with what e-mail is all about. And in no way does unfamilarity provide a basis for making something up. It makes me wonder if the author even looked at the posting record.

Look, I'm happy with the outcome and the article certainly supports our POV that something is very fishy about MD4BUSH. Heck, look who posted the article! But I am very disappointed in the sloppy journalism that's out there and feel it is our duty to point out factual errors regardless of whether we support the article's premise or not.

[marty60]

Yep and their activities make reading post and replies a much more serious undertaking these days.