To: demkicker
you can think how you wish of course but the term "traitor" is hardly what I see when he expresses his opinion. You can disagree with him all you like but calling him a traitor is overreacting and not how legitimate conservative blogs and pundits view him.......not at all....calling him a traitor is a DU or Daily Kos type of slander
To: NorCalRepub
Then you and I will agree to disagree. I regret to say that Senator McCain is a powerful man. With that power comes responsibility. For McCain to go to the country where our military is fighting terrorists and announce that the key to our finishing the job lies with the number of casualties we suffer, is subversive, IMO.
He may as well be saying, "Psssst, all terrorists here me now. If you can manage to escalate your attacks on our military, then you have a real good chance of seeing us cut and run! Keep it up, for there is hope you can defeat the mighty USA."
Any concerns John McCain has about the war can be heard by people in the highest of places in our government. The jackass doesn't have to continue mugging for the camera and harping about "the mistakes" we've made. He is a fool and a traitor to be piling on and lowering the moral of the military men and women of which he used to be apart.
137 posted on
02/19/2005 2:28:27 PM PST by
demkicker
(John McCain is a power hungry traitor and proved it on 2/19/05 in Iraq)
To: NorCalRepub
you can think how you wish of course but the term "traitor" is hardly what I see when he expresses his opinion. You can disagree with him all you like but calling him a traitor is overreacting and not how legitimate conservative blogs and pundits view him.......not at all....calling him a traitor is a DU or Daily Kos type of slander Exactly. I think that he was stating some fairly obvious points. The terrorists certainly did not learn anything by listening to his comments.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson