Replies

Actually, what is pointed out continually, is that the FOSSIL RECORD is in doubt because all it is, is dead things buried down in rock layers laid down by water.

And that is all it is.

It is not proof of anything in itself, it is just dead things buried in rock layers laid down by water.

Where you go from there is the issue.

NONE of the evolutionary theories can stand the scrutiny of the fossil record, as I clearly show and as this most recent article proves ("Neanderthal" skull was actually human but because of false dates was accepted as ancient...meaning not one 'Evolutionary Expert' had the brains to see it was a "modern Human")

And that is the whole point here.

Repeatedly, Evolutionists theories have been destroyed when science steps in and tells them how wrong they are, but then all the evolutionist does is change their theories to match the preconceived notions that everything evolved, whereas the Creationist just has to sit back and laugh and wait for GOOD SCIENCE to expose the latest complex FRAUD upon science, and then engage in trying to educate those who think they are so smart to accept a modern skull as an ancient NEANDERTAHAL Skull.

not one 'Evolutionary Expert' had the brains to see it was a "modern Human"....And that is the whole point here.

Indeed that is exactly the point. If scientists approach the evidence with a belief in long ages, then that is what they will usually see. They won't see the obviously modern skull in front of them. They won't test for short ages, they will test only for long ages.

And they are doing this with everything. They expect long ages, so they don't thoroughly examine the dating techniques and assumptions for problems.

They expect long ages, so they interpret ice cores to have long ages. ICR has an Ice core model that matches the data much better than the evolutionist model. Recently, some secular scientists dated volcanic ash in the ice core last month and said the oldest glacier on Earth might be less than 50,000 years old. (Those particular scientists are into global warming so there might be a political agenda).

They expect long ages, so they approach the fossil record expecting that and don't ask the questions that would lead them to conclude otherwise. They miss the obvious contradictions because they aren't even looking for them.