[Dimensio]

He met it?

You asked for "one". I provided more than "one". I met your challenge, and then some.

You just want to redefine the terms after the fact because you are utterly incapable of admitting a single mistake. You want to weasel around with terminology, and for some reason I feel a desire to dredge up an old posting where you "proved" that the theory of evolution included abiognesis by citing three statements from sources that did not, in any way, place abiogenesis as the part of the theory of evolution.

Thing is, I'm not sure if I should bother. You still will ignore your brazen dishonesty and hypocracy, and there's no need to demo your outlandish attitude to others because anyone who has watched your recent antics and hasn't come to the conclusion that you're a shameless liar is blind.

[Dataman]

You asked for "one". I provided more than "one". I met your challenge,

I admitted you met my challenge of fining one. You did not, however, support your allegation of "often." Of course you and the other much-protesting bunch already know that.