To: Long Cut
How do you know anything has been debunked? Have you taken the time to study the rebuttals in depth, or are you just an evo groupie?
459 posted on
02/22/2005 6:34:59 AM PST by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Oh, I've read the entire thread. AND all the rebuttals both here and elsewhere. It's become quite plain exactly who is lying outright and who is supporting them.
Not everyone is as gullible as you seem to believe.
462 posted on
02/22/2005 6:42:32 AM PST by
Long Cut
(The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
To: Michael_Michaelangelo
Have you taken the time to study the rebuttals in depth, or are you just an evo groupie?
What rebuttals? I pointed out -- with documentation -- that RaceBannon's "quotes" used to prove that C14 dating is totally unreliable were deceptively misleading at best and outright lies at worst. His "rebuttal" was to repeat the same list of quotes again, without comment.
475 posted on
02/22/2005 7:43:26 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson