[RaceBannon]

I am not dodging rebuttals like you accuse, I just have too many people that have me on their ping lists, I am being selective. Plus, I have more than 3 people trying to "catch me" in an error.

I have missed a few retorts, I admit, but I tried to make it up with my last lengthy response on C-14.

However, the constant mantra that I am lying is clearly immature on the part of those who throw it out.

If you want to call a theory a lie or fairy tale, that is fair game, but calling people liars, that is a different thing.

And there are two people who continually like to accuse others of being liars when all they do is believe the facts present something different than the other interprets it as.

and I believe I am on the right side of the argument, and that mens I will defend my argument when I can. I dont troll the thread to find easy pickings, either, I am only responding to those who have already responded to me.

Would you like me to start trolling?

I aint got the time! I have homework, too! (night classes, going for an EE. )

[Thatcherite]

I have missed a few retorts, I admit, but I tried to make it up with my last lengthy response on C-14.

Why do you think posting another long cut-and-paste argument much of which was the same stuff that has already been amply discredited in this thread was "making up" for your failure to back up your previous posts? For example that post contained the mollusk shell non-argument yet again. Much of the rest was an almost entirely unevidenced wild hypothesis about historical C14 levels which is amply falsified already by reference to the C14 dates of objects of known age.

However, the constant mantra that I am lying is clearly immature on the part of those who throw it out. If you want to call a theory a lie or fairy tale, that is fair game, but calling people liars, that is a different thing.

What about people who continue to push hypotheses based on misleading arguments after those arguments have been shown to be misleading. And who posts the same demonstrated misleading arguments again and again without modifying them or acknowledging that there is a counter-case. What would you call a poster who reposted arguments without properly addressing the rebuttals of their arguments that have already been posted?

I understand that you don't want to abandon your cod-scientific beliefs because you have made them an integral part of your religion. Bad luck.

[shubi]

"I aint got the time! I have homework, too! (night classes, going for an EE. )"

Yikes, another engineer that won't understand scientific method. This is getting scary. What Bible College offers and engineering degree?

You know that electricity is just a theory?