Humans were around 27,400 years ago. The remarkable thing about the find was that it was the oldest evidence of human habitation in the region. If it had been a Neanderthal skull the article would have indicated that it was a Neanderthal skull. Believe me, I've seen both human skulls and Neanderthal skulls, you can tell the difference right off.
This PROVES that evolution is wrong, for Neanderthals have been so called ancient human ancestors, not supposed to exist today, yet when we find a similar looking skull, we label it NEANDERTHAL...only the Skull is only 255 years old!!
You've got your science wrong. Neanderthals were human relatives, but evolved from a different offshoot of a common ancestor. They weren't our ancestors.
Funny, creationists use the argument that a form that has moved up the branch is NOT transitional, until they think it helps them refute evolution.
It is also amusing that they try to use evolution to refute evolution when they don't do science. No creationist does science ever. They never do and that is all there is to it. ROFL
But that is the problem here, Neanbdethals would look just like me or you if you gave him a shave and a haircut, and so would cro-magnon.
People do NOT look so different.
All these differences between skull shapes show is genetic variation or disease or vitimin dificiency, all of these quite acceptable within the Creationist framework.
It is ONLY the theory of Evolution that says one form became another or is "related" to another because one died out or something.
Mankind has taken on may different body styles, all a person has to do is examine the size of men in this last century alone, because of increased medicine, healthier living, and some say artificial hormones, women mature sexually faster and men become large at a younger age, but NONE of that is evolutioon by chance, it is an artifial enhancement due to outside forces that act upon the existing gene pool.
What seems to get left out of all of this is that angels mated with women and their offspring was some kind of hybrid. The human population was becoming corrupted on a large scale with these angel genes and this in large part is why mankind except Noah and his family were destroyed. Hybrids could not ultimately be saved as when Christ came he became a propitiation for mankind not angel or man- angelkind. Also it appears that demons tried to imitate what the angel had done. The angels were judged and locked up in chains of darkness. It seems that the giants that were around at the time of King David may have been demon (fallen angel) and man hybrids. Now just how do all you evolutionist think that all these corrupted gene pools might show up in fossil record? Wouldn't you automatically call them another evolutionary link because you were not aware of things that went on that were out of the realm of your knowledge?