Replies

In 1982, Zihlman published an illustration of Lucy's left side juxtaposed with the right side of a pygmy chimp. That image clearly showed the parallels between the early human fossil remains and pygmy chimps. "It was so dramatic, you couldn't deny that our early ancestors were chimplike," says Zihlman.

All it did was prove that the small ape that people call Lucy looks like a Pygmy Chimp.

There is NO EVIDENCE that Lucy is a transitional form in any reality, only in the minds of evolutionary thought.

It is not a FACT, only a guess, and a bad one at that, because since you posted it here for all to see, ets repeat it again:

That image clearly showed the parallels between the early human fossil remains and pygmy chimps

That man put the bones of an ape like creeature next to an ape like creature, and said not because of any fact, but because he believes in evolution that therefore, humans looked like pygmy chimps a long time ago!

Evolution is such a fun theory, you can think of any zany theory like microbes on meteors to aliens with a mission to populate the univers, but if someone says, "In the Beginning, God..."

That man put the bones of an ape like creeature next to an ape like creature, and said not because of any fact, but because he believes in evolution that therefore, humans looked like pygmy chimps a long time ago!

Go boldly where no Creationist as gone before and be honest for once. Admit you never read my post or the article is linked to.

Adrienne Zihlman has girl parts.

Race, your FR street cred is considerable. Which is why it pains me to see you having put so much conviction into something based on such lies.

You've been around the block on these threads long enough to know that the arguments & sources you've been posting have been totally discredited. Why repeat them over & over like you're doing? Why do you fear evolutionary theory so?