To: ncjetsfan
"all of the hijackers entered the U.S. legally, which means they qualified for drivers licenses. The Real ID Act wouldn't change that. Moreover, you don't need a driver's license to fly. Other forms of identification--such as a passport--are acceptable and also were available to the hijackers. Nothing in the Sensenbrenner bill would change that, either. " The people behind this ID bill don't care about terrorists, they're simply playing to the anti-immigrant crowd who want to make it more difficult for immigrants to compete in the job market.
What the anti-immigrants who can't keep a job don't realize is that they are their own worse enemies, not the immigrants. Most employers would rather close their business than hire the type of whining insecure malcontents that we see populating the immigration threads on FR.
13 posted on
02/19/2005 6:49:09 AM PST by
bayourod
("It's for the children" has been replaced by "It's to fight terrorists.")
To: bayourod
15 posted on
02/19/2005 6:51:36 AM PST by
dakine
To: bayourod
Most employers would rather close their business than hire the type of whining insecure malcontents that we see populating the immigration threads on FR. You really should stop talking about yourself bayourod, conceit is so unseemly.
To: bayourod
bayourod, for the umteenth time, it's ANTI-ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS not ANTI-IMMIGRANTS. Can you not comprehend the concept of ILLEGAL?
29 posted on
02/19/2005 7:30:20 AM PST by
antisocial
(Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
To: bayourod
If the immigrants are in this country legally how will this bill hurt them?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson