> A wing without feathers is a wing without feathers.
Indeed? Compare the forelimbs of Archeopteryx and Compsognathus. Let us all know how massively different they are.
But that would actually involve examination of evidence, so I can see how it would make IDiots afraid...
A simple concept that is clearly too difficult for either of you two evotwirps to grasp.
It's quite likely that neither of you know enough anatomy between the two of you to even play the old Milton Bradley game, "Operation," successfully.
The self important belches of what either of you think passes for brilliance on these threads shows what a truly dismal command of science you have.
Get some education in science that begins with anatomy 101, and then we'll talk. Until then we're all still laughing at you, and all the other willfully blinded fools on your side that refuse to recognize the abundant, direct, self-evidence of design in nature.