It says God made light and divided it from darkness. Apparently God made light before He made the Sun. That's not surprising, given what else we are told in scripture. In Revelations, God lights up the city of God and it has no need for the Sun. Rev 22:5
Did God make the earth and the heavens in six days or one as the Bible says here Gen 2:4?
He made it in 6 as described in Gen 1. Gen 2:4 uses day as a period of time. Gen 2:4 should be understood in light of what has already been told you in Gen 1.
Also, God rested on the seventh day and must be still resting because He hasn't started creating anything since.
How do you know He hasn't created anything since? I think He's been working His butt off trying to keep us from destroying ourselves.
But supposedly the Ancient Hebrew rabbi's taught that the earth would exist for 6,000 years and the 7th 1000 years would be a period of rest. We think it was about 2000 years to the flood, another 2000 years to Christ, and the signs are thick that we are in the last days prior to the 1000 year reign of Christ.
No doubt about it, a literal reading of Adam and Eve makes the Bible wrong again. That is why you must read it as a spiritual metaphor for creation of the Spirit that separates humans from animals and is the image of God in us.
No, it makes modern science wrong about it's conclusion. There is tremendous doubt about reading that non-literally. What's more 2 Peter 3 even warns us that there will be a day when people say "everything continues as it has from the beginning" and thereby forget creation and the flood. That's an uncanny description of uniformitarianism and naturalism and the result has been writing creation and the flood of as metaphors.
"Did you know that Adam and the Hebrew word for ground are the same word? "
I didn't realize they were similar, but a little research and it sound to me like "adam" means man, "Adam" becomes a proper noun in relation ship to the first man, "adamah" means ground. One site said the relationship of adam to adamah is kind of like earth to earthling.
So it is all speculation whether Adam came from ground or ground came from ground or animals came from Adam or animals came from ground or what.
I'm not aware of any Hebrew scholars that have a problem reading this. I don't think Hebrew scholars have any problem reading it as God made man out of the ground and God made the animals out of the ground.
I don't think anyone can understand this passage if taken literally, but that is just a theory.
Nobody can understand the Bible if they limit God to man's knowledge. If you do that, the creation, the flood, miracles, the redemption, judgement, heaven, hell, angels, demons, the afterlife, none of it will appear real. You have to give God a little credit, if you are going to believe scripture.
My literal reading is that we are still in day 6.