Yep, the Bible is read gud siance:
These are the birds you are to detest and not eat because they are detestable: the eagle, the vulture, the black vulture, the red kite, any kind of black kite, any kind of raven, the horned owl, the screech owl, the gull, any kind of hawk, the little owl, the cormorant, the great owl, the white owl, the desert owl, the osprey, the stork, any kind of heron, the hoopoe and the bat. (Le 11:13-19).
“‘All flying insects that walk on all fours are to be detestable to you.
(Le 11:20).
There are, however, some winged creatures that walk on all fours that you may eat: those that have jointed legs for hopping on the ground. Of these you may eat any kind of locust, katydid, cricket or grasshopper.
The Holy Bible (Le 11:21-22).
That is the bird kind with the bat and let's count the legs on an insect:
Won, too, twee, eight, fifteen FOUR. OK lets check that:
Six, a thousand, won, Four. OK, RAAAAGT
Ahh want all maa childuns to larn siance frum de Baabul,
but that's only a theory and I am not wearing a shubi industries aluminum hat.
I don't agree with the six-day thing, either. But, on the other hand, I am not sure someone who does make that part of his framework of faith deserves to be ridiculed like that, especially here. It's that sort of attitude that makes me suspect there is more to the pro-evolution stance than cold science.
Are you honestly afraid that all the DannyTNs out there are going to plunge us into another Dark Ages? Is that going to be a part of the coming Bush Theocracy I'm always hearing about?
With all due respect, it is disappointing, and does absolutely nothing to help persuade other people to your point of view.