Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
C14 is used more in archeology than paleontology. Other methods that measure millions of years are used more often for fossils. I don't know why creationists get hung up on C14, when it is past 6000 years anyway and thus in their fevered minds could not exist.
173 posted on 02/18/2005 11:25:03 AM PST by shubi (Peace through superior firepower.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: shubi

The original question by NYG was on C14. That's how the discussion on C14 got started.

The C14 results are indeed by 6000 years but there are ways of adjusting that downward. The point is that they show the fossils could not be millions of years old as claimed. It does not validate Creationists claims but it does indicate that evolutionists are way off.


186 posted on 02/18/2005 12:21:31 PM PST by DannyTN (66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: shubi

The original question by NYG was on C14. That's how the discussion on C14 got started.

The C14 results are indeed by 6000 years but there are ways of adjusting that downward. The point is that they show the fossils could not be millions of years old as claimed. It does not validate Creationists claims but it does indicate that evolutionists are way off.


187 posted on 02/18/2005 12:21:33 PM PST by DannyTN (66)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson