Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanMade1776
"[I] have no interest in what this little pixie has to say now."

This comment ties in to what I wrote about in post No. 276. (I'm singling it out only because it happened to fall immediately after my own post, and so was easy for me to spot.)

"Little pixie"? This is what I meant by emotion trumping reason. I don't see what cause is served by this kind of rhetoric. I don't watch or listen to Sean Hannity, either. But what point is advanced with name-calling? What goal does it accomplish? How does "little pixie" persuade anyone that Hannity's ideas or opinions are wrong?

298 posted on 02/17/2005 4:42:53 PM PST by Semolina Pilchard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]


To: Semolina Pilchard
Semolina Pilchard, I looked at your site http://rightandwrong.typepad.com/, and I can tell that you put a lot of thought into whatever you write.

As for me calling Hannity," a little Pixie", I am sure Hannity can overcome it. I mean Hannity said much worse about Free Republic.

306 posted on 02/17/2005 4:50:06 PM PST by AmericanMade1776 ( The Year of Freeping Dangerously)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson