To: antiRepublicrat
"Two, it was about hypothetical systems, not real and tested (it was basically just counting exploits)."
Most tests are hypothetical.
Take any ZDNET benchmarks or the TPC benchmarks or most other tests, and they have to make certain assumptions to imitate real life.
You are clutching at straws.
Thiu just proves what the guy in post 3 above said, and I quote:
"This theory will NEVER be accepted by the already-hate-spewing
venemous Anti-Microsoft crowd. It just cannot be!"
He was right. :)
To: KwasiOwusu
Most tests are hypothetical. Take any ZDNET benchmarks or the TPC benchmarks or most other tests, and they have to make certain assumptions to imitate real life. Those benchmarks actually have computers running them. This was just a vulnerability count, nothing more, entirely theoretical.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson