Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: N3WBI3
Agreed. I said much the same in my Post #316. You said it better. Thanks.
338 posted on 02/18/2005 1:39:54 AM PST by ThePythonicCow (Welcome home, Vietnam Vets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]


To: ThePythonicCow; N3WBI3
"From the description of this 'study' its pretty useless to make any conclusions...
Agreed. I said much the same in my Post #316. You said it better. Thanks"


TommyDale pretty much predicted the reaction of the open source loonies in post 3:

"This theory will NEVER be accepted by the already-hate-spewing
venemous Anti-Microsoft crowd. It just cannot be!"


We pretty much predicted this normal ostrich like reaction from you guys.
So what's new? LOL!
Same old living in denial by the open source loonies.
Read this. That should cheer you up some. :)
Pretty much corborates what this test came up with.

http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/10/035225&from=rss

My own favorite parts:

"the developers of the GRSecurity kit and RSBAC are getting increasingly angry over security holes in Linux and the design of the Linux Security Modules"

AND

"Given that I'm getting lousy uptimes on my Linux servers because of the mandatory kernel upgrades, I certainly welcome a (constructive) critical look at Linux kernel security. "


Ain't life just sweet?

343 posted on 02/18/2005 2:07:45 AM PST by KwasiOwusu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson