So your only objection to this article is it's reference to a young earth, not to some mountains being formed as a result of the flood?
No, the whole article is bad. It's dishonest, misleading, and plain bad science -- not to mention being based on an attempt to force the Bible into a Dark Ages (literally) interpretation.Do a word study on the Hebrew word olam and its use in the Bible. Seriously, you'll find that there's no conflict at all between good science and good theology.