Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN
Agreed, both can't be right. That doesn't mean both are wrong.

Still trying to have it both ways, eh?

Thank you, but after rereading it, I may not have been clear. If the earth is young, then the earliest mountains, pre-Flood mountains, may have eroded faster since the soil may not have hardened into rock.

Strike 2. Soil is a result of erosion and is a thin layer. Mountains by definition don't consist of very much soil because of their erosional gradient. The fact that you are preposing such theories shows you really don't know much about geological processes.

I think it's consistent with a YEC even if it's novel.

I would hope that accuracy would be more important than novelty or consistency with your theory.

Argument by name calling.

Mine was an accurate observation - liberals often use the same "logic" in their debates against facts they find inconvenient as you were using there. Which brings us to another favored liberal tactic - declaring that an accurate observation is somehow name calling.

And then the never witnessed geologcal events are summarily dismissed.

Oh, the never witnessed events are the kinds of things that would kill millions if not billions of people. There are ample records of them in the geological column. Supervolcano eruptions (the last one, tens of thousands of years ago, is estimated to have killed all but a few thousand of the humans on the planet at the time). Flood basalts. Catastrophic meteor impacts. Hillary Clinton as president.

Things I'd rather not ever witness. But we can still make reasonable predictions as to what they would entail.

79 posted on 02/17/2005 9:52:35 AM PST by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
"The fact that you are preposing such theories shows you really don't know much about geological processes."

The fact that I'm proposing such theories, shows that I haven't bought into a billions year old earth. And that I don't presume that all soil came from rock.

Hillary Clinton as president.

As old as evolutionists may think she is, I still do not believe she is much older than 6000 years.

80 posted on 02/17/2005 9:59:49 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
"The fact that you are preposing such theories shows you really don't know much about geological processes."

The fact that I'm proposing such theories, shows that I haven't bought into a billions year old earth. And that I don't presume that all soil came from rock.

Hillary Clinton as president.

As old as evolutionists may think she is, I still do not believe she is much older than 6000 years.

81 posted on 02/17/2005 9:59:54 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson