That said, I didn't hear Sean's comments. Since the summer, I have been listening to Michael Medved instead. Though Hannity's views are probably closer to my conservative beliefs then Medved's, I learn ever so much more from Michael. Sean is shallow, immature, narcissistic, vein, a mental lightweight, and BOOOOOORING! If I heard him promote his book one more time, there wouldn't be a hair left in my scalp. (Hopefully MEDVED will not make the same error).
Hannity is way over rated (He makes the same mistake as many of his listeners when he over rates himself) and doesn't belong where he is. He is quite limited and not nearly as talented, intelligent and knowledgeable as other talk show hosts. Whatever IT is, he hasn't got IT. I find it incredible he has gotten as far as he has (and then I want to gag on those frequent occasions when he tells his audience, they too can "make it", just like HE did).
At least for now, between the hours of 3 to 6, I GAG no more.
I allways thought Hannity was a 911 star. HIs show was syndicated around that time. I agree with your comments about him being an intellectual lightweight.
I had thought he was a nice guy. After today, I see he is self serving and lacking in class.
Yeah, you know Sean is a good guy and I admire him for promoting the Freedom concerts, but I cringe a lot when I hear him debating some lib and he is unable to make strong arguments.
For instance, he had the the Democrat so-called evangelical Jim Wallace on the other day along with Jerry Falwell. Sean kept trying to make a point over and over again about whether Wallace wqs pro-life. All the time Wallace was making ridiculous statements like "Reagan supported terrorists in Nicaragua" But Sean would not or could not refute these statements which he should be able to easily.