Batchelor is the way to go. I listen to him everynight and he is outstanding.
What was Ronald Reagan's 11th Commandment?
("Thou shall not speak ill of another Republican")
Well now Hannity, what to do.
On the flip side, Hannity is very passionate about what he does and I'll give him that. However, his debate style is viscous and non-informative when interviewing no-name socialist.
For example the Texas professor a month ago and this Indian who supports Churchill.
I would have liked to hear their position in their own words instead of Hannity interrupting every 10 seconds and not letting his guess dig themselves into a intellectual hole.
You know "We report You Decide"
Hannity styles and tone reminded me of the executioner/inquisitioner at the end of Mel Gibson's Braveheart.
The time-line during William Wallace's was questioned about his treason to "Longshanks" Edward I, while captured in handcuffs: Hannity said "Do you confess...DO YOU CONFESS!"
Well, it sound like Hannity during his direct Q and A segments. Is that a yes or a no. I THAT A YES OR A NO! JUST ANSWER THE QUESTION, IS THAT A YES OR A NOOOOOOOOO!!
Now on the flop side, Hannity will go out of his way to kiss the a$$es of thee all "powerful socialists leaders" on his show like todays Charley Rangel brown nosing job along with other Washington DC elite whom have similar positions as the Professor or the Indian in the past.
I like 65% of his show & I wish him well, but Hannity's radio show may be off the air in a few years if he doesn't remake himself.
I'm losing respect for him a slice at a time and today's rant about Free Republic is another chink in his armor.
Good Luck Sean...