I just logged on for a second and only read a handfull of responses, but based on the remarks I've seen, it appears that Sean needs to spend more time on FreeRepublic before he makes rash statements about its composition.
I would like to see him identify a more highly regulated and closely monitored website that still protects individualism and freedom of thought, as long as those thoughts are expressed in a socially acceptable manner. That does not mean that Freepers are restricted from expressing exasperation or sarcasm.
I won't comment further because I don't know what other invectives Sean aimed at FreeRepublic, nor have I read enough responses from those who frequent this website whose opinions I hold in the highest regard.
I don't watch Sean anymore and haven't for a very long time. He is a substandard interviewer at best, in my opinion. When a competent interviewer would follow-up on a comment made by a guest, Sean has that, "hurry and answer so I can ask the next question I have written down" look in his eyes. I often wondered if he even listens to his guest's answers because often he has been given an opening large enough to drive his ego through, but has failed to take advantage of the opportunity to call the guest to task.
I have been reading a preponderance of articles recently demeaning the internet and those who take the time to properly research allegations that members of the "professional journalist camp" are too lazy, unwilling or unable to verify, although they are more than willing to make those allegations.
The MSM has a watchdog and they don't like it.
God bless,
EODGUY
Sean comparing his thinking and his "board" to FR is like a utility player for the early '60's Mets comparing his baseball skills to Ted Williams in his prime!